Hey all. Was going through my facebook today and saw a post by BF3 saying that they were doing there press conference at GamesCon with EA today so I thought I would go check it out.

THE BIG NEWS!!!
BF3 is going to have co-op gameplay. They showed footage that two people were working together to complete a mission.

ALSO
They have released gameplay footage of flying a jet. I will stop typing and let you enjoy the footage.

they said it would have co-op at E3

well they showed footage of it today. Unless they did at E3. I didnt get to really see the E3 cause my connection was really slow that day.

Nice

and 1:34 is best part

BEAST MODE ACTIVATE! And I love the little camera bot at 1:32

F*** YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

EPIC!! only 2 more months!

loled at the bot

Flying seems a lot better than all the other BF. Seems there's room to actually fly!

That... Was... INCREDIBLE. I don't have words to describe how epic that trailer was. The way the convoy of vehicles moved to attack, the way the jets fly over the battle and spray bullets at low hanging helicopters, the scale of the battles, the number of players fighting. This game just looks like something else. Best multiplayer trailer I have ever seen, bar none. And the graphics + lighting continue to impress. I am preordering this game first chance I get. Need to grab a prepaid card (why should I trust EA with my credit card?) so I can grab it off Origin, get into the beta.

Awesome.

Damm why no 64 players on consoles, at least on PS3, thats not fair

They felt like giving something special to the PC players, after-all, the PC players are what made video games be possible. PC players are what started Battlefield.

Well not that I think but that the consoles can't handle so many people for their servers.

thebronxbomber wrote:

Well not that I think but that the consoles can't handle so many people for their servers.

Yeah, that's pretty much the deal there. I think they're cutting the limit in half for consoles. However, it's because it will make the game flow smoother, so it's a nice trade off. I'd rather have the game run smoothly with less people than have it glitch so badly I can't see where I'm aiming.

Well not in half, but in... (thinks in his head real quickly)

3/8ths

at least they can make it for 32 people on consoles

thebronxbomber wrote:

Well not that I think but that the consoles can't handle so many people for their servers.

they CAN. MAG splits up 256 players into 64 player servers on consoles

FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP!!!

Does anyone know if we are going to be able to drive that bot that ran into the wall?

modernwarfare132 wrote:

thebronxbomber wrote:

Well not that I think but that the consoles can't handle so many people for their servers.

they CAN. MAG splits up 256 players into 64 player servers on consoles

4 servers for one game?

Well its not that but MAG isn't as intensive as BF3 I think.

Ya I rented that game and thought it was going to be the holy grail of online gaming. Until I found out that the 256 player count was divided up. Never really got into it for the month that I had. Sent it back to gamfly and hard nothing good about since then.

I think the little bot is an EOD bot for defusing explosives.

Trister wrote:

Ya I rented that game and thought it was going to be the holy grail of online gaming. Until I found out that the 256 player count was divided up. Never really got into it for the month that I had. Sent it back to gamfly and hard nothing good about since then.

As in you can't play with all the other 255 players in the server? D:

And madbagger that would make more sense lol